The Supreme Court’s ruling clarifies that attorney-client privilege under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 applies only to independent advocates, not in-house counsel. As salaried employees lacking professional independence, in-house lawyers’ communications with employers are not privileged, exposing internal legal advice to disclosure. Companies must therefore route sensitive matters through external counsel to ensure statutory confidentiality.
Revisiting Privilege: Implications of the Supreme Court’s Ruling on In‑House Counsel Communication
- Article
- Padmaja Kaul
- March 10, 2026
POST TAGS
Articles & Publications
- Article
- October 30, 2026
Rent reform, yes - but not without Judges: What the Gujarat Rent Bill 2026 gets wrong
- Article
- October 29, 2026
Regulating the Digital Shelf: Analysing the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) (Amendment) Rules, 2026
- Article
- October 28, 2026
Capital Pathways to Infrastructure
- Article
- October 26, 2026
Shelter, not speculation: redefining the homebuyer’s place in India’s Insolvency framework
- Article
- October 26, 2026
Contemporary Practices of AI Platforms: How Far does India’s Data Protection Regime Reach
- Article
- October 23, 2026





Padmaja is a proficient legal practitioner with extensive and diverse experience of over 13 years in corporate commercial laws and dispute resolution, specializing in commercial litigation, arbitration, white collar crime, employment disputes, insolvency and pre-dispute advisory.